‹ Back to news

Publication PLOS ONE · April 2026

A study asking whether an abnormal placental separation at delivery is not just an acute emergency, but also a signal of a mother’s health risk years down the line, published in PLOS ONE. I contributed to the design and the analysis.

638,911Vaginal deliveries analyzed
1.95Mortality hazard ratio, placental retention
1.59Mortality hazard ratio, placental abruption
3.5 yrsMean follow-up

Hazard ratios adjusted for age, race, and social determinants of health; both statistically significant at p < 0.001. Crude mortality was 6.4, 9.8, and 12.0 deaths per 1,000 deliveries for normal separation, abruption, and retention, respectively.

In plain language When the placenta separates from the womb the wrong way during childbirth, it can be dangerous in the moment. This study asked a less-examined question: does it also matter for a mother’s health years later? The team used a large United States medical-records network to follow nearly 639,000 women who gave birth vaginally, comparing normal deliveries against two problem groups. In one, the placenta detached too early (abruption). In the other, the placenta failed to deliver and had to be removed (retention).

Over an average of about three and a half years, both problem groups had higher death rates than women with normal deliveries: roughly 6 deaths per 1,000 births for normal separation, about 10 per 1,000 after abruption, and 12 per 1,000 after retention. After accounting for age, race, and social factors, women with retention had about a 95 percent higher risk of dying, and women with abruption about a 59 percent higher risk.

The telling detail is when the risk appears. For abruption, the danger clusters in the weeks right after birth. Once those early deaths are set aside, the extra risk largely disappears. For retention, the elevated risk lingers for years. That pattern suggests the two conditions may flag different underlying problems: acute emergencies after abruption, and slower-building chronic disease after retention.

Why it matters: an abnormal placental separation may be an early warning sign rather than a one-time event, and it could give clinicians a reason to watch these mothers’ long-term heart, kidney, and vascular health more closely. The authors are careful to note this is an association, not proof of cause, and more research is needed.

Scientific summary This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX federated electronic-health-record network to compare long-term all-cause maternal mortality across three placental-separation phenotypes among 638,911 vaginal inpatient deliveries (625,890 normal, 5,435 abruption, 7,586 retention), with a mean follow-up of 3.5 years and 2.21 million person-years. In multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models adjusted for age, race, and social determinants of health, both retention (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.59 to 2.40) and abruption (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.08) were independently associated with increased mortality (both p < 0.001). Temporal sensitivity analyses separated the two phenotypes: excluding deaths within 42 days removed the abruption signal (HR 1.31, p = 0.089) while retention stayed statistically significant (HR 1.93, p < 0.001), and long-term models confirmed a sustained retention-associated hazard (HR 2.02 beyond one year). The authors interpret abruption mortality as acute-event driven and retention mortality as reflecting persistent chronic-disease burden, with inflammation and shared placental malperfusion proposed as mechanisms. Key limitations include ICD-code misclassification, residual confounding by unmeasured body-mass index, an inability to establish temporality, and a global proportional-hazards assumption violation (p = 0.0002; the primary exposure term satisfied it at p = 0.62).

What it means

  1. An abnormal placental separation may be worth treating as a long-term risk marker, not only an acute event. Placental retention in particular carried elevated mortality risk for years after delivery, which argues for extended postpartum and cardiovascular follow-up.
  2. Surveillance can be tailored to the phenotype. Abruption calls for vigilance in the acute peripartum window, when acute vascular events dominate, while retention argues for sustained monitoring of chronic cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic conditions.
  3. These are associations, not proven causal effects. The findings are best used to inform risk stratification and prospective research, including better classification and control for obesity, rather than immediate causal claims.

Jasani, S.,† Demiray, A.† Stevenson, J., & Krawiec, C. (2026). A comparison of long-term maternal mortality associated with pathologic placental separation: Highlighting possible trends and mechanisms. PLOS ONE, 21(4), e0338586. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338586
† Shared first authorship.